Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] HID: sensor-hub: Fix out-of-bounds write in sensor_hub_get_feature

srinivas pandruvada <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-input
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2026-08-05 at 18:57 +0000, bakabaka9 wrote:
> From: Xingrui Li <[email protected]>
> 
> sensor_hub_get_feature() clamps its return value to the caller's
> buffer
> size, but the copy loop still copies field->report_size / 8 bytes for
> each report value. A malicious HID descriptor can advertise a large
> feature field size while an IIO caller supplies a small stack buffer,
> such as a single s32, causing an out-of-bounds write.
> 
> HID core stores parsed report values in __s32 slots and clamps
> extracted
> values to 32 bits. Reject feature fields that require more than one
> slot
> per value, guard the total byte count calculation, and clamp each
> per-value copy to the remaining caller buffer.
> 
> Fixes: 5459ada2b3cd69 ("HID: sensor-hub: Fix packing of result buffer
> for feature report")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Assisted-by: OpenAI:GPT-5.5-Cyber
> Signed-off-by: Xingrui Li <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> --
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-
> hub.c
> index 34f710c465b8..6470a290ebfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> @@ -239,12 +239,17 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct
> hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
>  			   u32 field_index, int buffer_size, void
> *buffer)
>  {
>  	struct hid_report *report;
> +	struct hid_field *field;
>  	struct sensor_hub_data *data = hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
> -	int report_size;
> +	size_t field_size;
> +	size_t report_size;
> +	size_t copied = 0;
> +	size_t to_copy;
>  	int ret = 0;
> -	u8 *val_ptr;
> -	int buffer_index = 0;
> -	int i;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (!buffer || buffer_size <= 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	memset(buffer, 0, buffer_size);
>  
> @@ -258,26 +263,29 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct
> hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
>  	hid_hw_request(hsdev->hdev, report, HID_REQ_GET_REPORT);
>  	hid_hw_wait(hsdev->hdev);
>  
> +	field = report->field[field_index];
> +
>  	/* calculate number of bytes required to read this field */
> -	report_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(report->field[field_index]-
> >report_size,
> -				   8) *
> -				   report->field[field_index]-
> >report_count;
> -	if (!report_size) {
> +	field_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(field->report_size, 8);
> +	/* HID core stores each parsed report value in a __s32 slot.
> */
> +	if (!field_size || field_size > sizeof(field->value[0])) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto done_proc;
> +	}
> +	if (field->report_count > SIZE_MAX / field_size) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto done_proc;
>  	}
> -	ret = min(report_size, buffer_size);
>  
> -	val_ptr = (u8 *)report->field[field_index]->value;
> -	for (i = 0; i < report->field[field_index]->report_count;
> ++i) {
> -		if (buffer_index >= ret)
> -			break;
> +	report_size = field_size * field->report_count;
> +	report_size = min_t(size_t, report_size, buffer_size);
>  
> -		memcpy(&((u8 *)buffer)[buffer_index], val_ptr,
> -		       report->field[field_index]->report_size / 8);
> -		val_ptr += sizeof(__s32);
> -		buffer_index += (report->field[field_index]-
> >report_size / 8);
> +	for (i = 0; i < field->report_count && copied < report_size;
> ++i) {
> +		to_copy = min(field_size, report_size - copied);
> +		memcpy(&((u8 *)buffer)[copied], &field->value[i],
> to_copy);
> +		copied += to_copy;
>  	}
> +	ret = copied;
>  
>  done_proc:
>  	mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.