Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: use IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS

On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:00:05 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 12:18:52AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 23:59:34 +0100
> > Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> wrote:  
> > > On Sun,  9 Aug 2026 11:24:42 +0530
> > > Yash Suthar <[email protected]> wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > Actually no. I've backed that out. 
> > 
> > Given the data alignment is fixed, if we were going to do this it would
> > be clearer as 
> > struct {
> > 	s16 chans[3]; //see later, I believe this should be __le16
> > 	aligned_s64 timestamp;
> > };
> > 
> > But that is very similar to the structure that follows immediately after
> > this, but that has __le16 chans[] 
> > 
> > So what is going on here?  
> 
> AI slop?

It's the original code I'm complaining about. Been around a while!
So for once, nope (I think!)


Jonathan

>