Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iio: adc: ti-ads112c04: Add support for TI ADS112C04
Kyle Hsieh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF7HswPvpdgGz_B_cYWBze6ab=+q=X1UG_LTKgdCj1i9Tyz1Ug@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 3:30 PM Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote: ... > You quoted tons of comments to which you haven't replied. Are you agree with > them? Sorry - I agreed with all of them and have already applied them in v5, I just didn't say so. To be explicit: - wait_for_completion_timeout() is now used directly in the if condition - err/ret swapped in ads112c04_wait_for_data() - i is unsigned int, declared separately from the assignment - reference-sources uses fwnode_property_match_property_string() - single-channel has its own variable instead of reusing pair[0] - ARRAY_SIZE(pair) instead of the hardcoded 2 - fsleep(1 * USEC_PER_MSEC) instead of fsleep(1000) - the internal reference macro is ADS112C04_INT_REF_mV and now sits at the top of the file with the other defines - the IRQ is no longer disabled at all, so the unbalanced depth issue is gone I'll trim quoted text and reply per comment from now on. ... > I'm not sure how the binding might be affected by that. reset-gpio should be > direct replacement of the custom "reset" GPIO handling in the driver. You're right, I had that wrong - reset-gpio builds the reset controller from the existing reset-gpios property, so the binding is unchanged and David's Reviewed-by is unaffected. Switched to devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() in v5. Thanks, Kyle Hsieh