Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: unify staging buffer and convert to iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts()

Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <20260820031519.56bc8d09@jic23-huawei>
On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:18:44 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 08:15:40AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > On 19/08/2026 03:09, Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:51:20 +0100
> > > Gabriel Rondon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > v1 was a single patch converting the two push sites to
> > > > iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(). Reviewing it, Jonathan pointed out that
> > > > the driver carries two separate staging areas holding the same thing
> > > > (buffer[8] and the scan struct), and asked to fold the cleanup into this
> > > > set.
> > > > 
> > > > So v2 is a two-patch series: patch 1 drops the redundant buffer and
> > > > routes the one-shot read and the triggered handler through scan, and
> > > > patch 2 does the deprecated-API conversion, now with a single buffer to
> > > > push at both sites.
> > > > 
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - New patch 1: drop buffer[8], use scan for the one-shot read and the
> > > >    triggered handler, move IIO_DMA_MINALIGN onto scan (Jonathan)
> > > > - Patch 2 now pushes data->scan at both sites instead of data->buffer
> > > >   
> > > Nice.  All looks good to me, so I'll queue it up.
> > > 
> > > Applied to the testing branch of iio.git which will be rebased on rc1 once
> > > available.
> > > 
> > > Note that there is plenty of time for additional feedback, tags or indeed
> > > me to drop it again if someone spots something I missed.  
> > 
> > Ah, Jonathan was quick and efficient :)

Hmm. Worried about too many thing floating around is more accurate.

> > I'll drop my comments to 'nits' in order to not generate more work for  
> 
> And I, in the opposite, insist on mine against patch 1 as I consider that that
> makes code easier to read and follow.
True enough - so tweaked

Jonathan

> 
> > Jonathan. Hence, acting on my comments is not required.  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.