Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] iio: adc: Add support for Texas Instruments ADS112C04
Kyle Hsieh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF7HswO-K3-g9ki366BTEY1pkf-Vvb4ohQCEM7oS3XhWXG00aw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 9:25 AM Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 15:51:50 +0800 > Kyle Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This patch series introduces support for the Texas Instruments ADS112C04 > > Analog-to-Digital Converters. > > > > The ADS112C04 (16-bit) is precision, low-power, delta-sigma ADCs with > > an I2C interface. They feature a flexible input multiplexer supporting > > single-ended and differential measurements, a programmable gain amplifier, > > and an internal voltage reference. > > > > Note: While this chip shares similarities with the ADS112C14 (currently > > being upstreamed by David Lechner), the register maps and feature sets > > are sufficiently different to warrant a separate driver. However, the > > DT bindings and channel parsing logic have been aligned with the > > ADS112C14 conventions. > > > > This initial submission provides a minimal feature set (single-shot > > conversions and basic DRDY interrupt) covering current use cases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kyle Hsieh <[email protected]> > > Sashiko had some feedback on the interrupt - if you are respinning for > other reasons it might be good to add a comment in the dt-binding about > it being an edge interrupt. From a quick look at the datasheet a level > interrupt would not make much sense. > Makes sense. Since DRDY is a pulse, an edge trigger is indeed the right choice. I'll add the note to the binding if I respin, or send it as a follow-up patch. Thanks for the review. Kyle Hsieh