Re: [PATCH v2] iio: proximity: aw96103: Fix early return in IRQ handler loop
Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260823191848.272c910f@jic23-huawei> |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2026 05:09:25 +0100 Salah Triki <[email protected]> wrote: > When an unrecognized proximity status is encountered in aw96103_irq(), > the default case executes a return IRQ_HANDLED. Because this happens > inside the loop over the device's channels, any remaining channels are > left unhandled, causing missed events and stale IRQ status. > > Replace the return IRQ_HANDLED statement in the default case with > continue to ensure all channels are processed even if one has an > unexpected status value. > > This issue was found via code inspection. > > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <[email protected]> Applied to the testing branch of iio.git. Another one I forgot for reasons I apply quicker than average (see reply the tmp117) - Low risk changes - either because of code (true here) or because of timing the tree is getting rebased anyway (also true) Jonathan > --- > Changes since v1: > -Remove Fixes tag as this is hardening rather than a fix for a real-world bug. > -Mention in commit message that the issue was identified through code reading. > > drivers/iio/proximity/aw96103.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/aw96103.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/aw96103.c > index 8fbb755dcae0..b1f36a51d56f 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/aw96103.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/aw96103.c > @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static irqreturn_t aw96103_irq(int irq, void *data) > iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev)); > break; > default: > - return IRQ_HANDLED; > + continue; > } > aw96103->channels_arr[i].old_irq_status = curr_status; > }