Re: [PATCH v6 9/9] iio: accel: mma8452: Use proper error code when missing device model
Joshua Crofts <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:27:47 +0200 Esben Haabendal <[email protected]> wrote: > The device is there, but we don't have data describing how to use it. A bit of a weird commit message IMO, I'd do Switch -ENODEV error on i2c_get_match_data() failure to -ENODATA to satisfy the IIO coding style. (but this is only my opinion). (We recently had a few conversations about -ENODEV vs. -ENODATA and while there are a lot of uses of -ENODEV in IIO they should be replaced with -ENODATA when checking *_get_match_data() results). > > Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c > index 4a1eb196589a..42e3371cdb1d 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c > @@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client) > > data->chip_info = i2c_get_match_data(client); > if (!data->chip_info) > - return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "unknown device model\n"); > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODATA, "unknown device model\n"); > > ret = iio_read_mount_matrix(dev, &data->orientation); > if (ret) > Reviewed-by: Joshua Crofts <[email protected]> -- Kind regards, Joshua Crofts