Re: [PATCH v6 7/9] iio: accel: mma8452: Drop unneeded lock acquire on read
Esben Haabendal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Joshua Crofts" <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:35:17 +0200 > Esben Haabendal <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "Joshua Crofts" <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:27:45 +0200 >> > Esben Haabendal <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> There is no need to acquire data->lock when calling mma8452_read(), and >> >> dropping that makes it less likely to end up in an AB-BA deadlock >> >> situation. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 2 -- >> >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c >> >> index 7ef1a9a91c31..9ae2c3e60576 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c >> >> @@ -504,9 +504,7 @@ static int mma8452_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, >> >> if (!iio_device_claim_direct(indio_dev)) >> >> return -EBUSY; >> >> >> >> - mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> >> ret = mma8452_read(data, buffer); >> >> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock); >> >> iio_device_release_direct(indio_dev); >> >> if (ret < 0) >> >> return ret; >> >> >> > >> > Sashiko has something to say and I tend to agree at the moment: >> > >> > Could removing this lock expose mma8452_read() to race conditions with PM >> > auto-suspend and event configuration? >> >> Yes. I tend to agree as well. >> >> > mma8452_read() can be interrupted by the PM auto-suspend worker, which puts >> > the device in STANDBY and disables regulators while mma8452_drdy() is actively >> > polling over I2C. This can lead to I/O timeouts or errors. >> >> Yes, and causing pain for other I2C devices on same bus :( >> >> > Additionally, concurrent sysfs writes to event configurations invoke >> > mma8452_change_config(), which puts the hardware into STANDBY to modify >> > registers. The Standby transition flushes the hardware FIFO. If this occurs >> > between the mma8452_drdy() check and the i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data() in >> > mma8452_read(), the block read will fetch flushed or stale data. >> >> Argh. Yet another level of trouble. >> >> Maybe we should extend the use of data->lock instead. Holding it >> 1. whenever doing read-modify-write actions >> 2. while holding the device in standby mode for changing registers >> 3. while doing suspend/resume >> >> I was just adding support for a open-drain mode irq sharing you know. >> While sashiko-bot definitely is catching lots of valid problems, and >> fixing them is a good thing, this is starting to feel like I opened >> Pandoras box by touching this driver :D >> >> I will try to wrap up a patch with the above described extended usage of >> data->lock, but hope we can find a way to get the irq sharing and open >> drain mode support merged, without necessarily having to fixing all and every >> possible existing bugs as a pre-condition, but maybe delay some work to >> later work. >> > > If they're pre-existing conditions then it's not required to fix those in the > same patch series, you can come back to it another time or someone else can fix > those. Great. I have created a local mma8452-next branch where I will continue the work on some of these issues. > Nevertheless this is an issue that will be caused directly by this patch if > applied. If your only goal is to add support for open-drain irq sharing, you > can probably just drop this for the time being and just focus on that. I will drop this particular patch for this series, and work on a proper fix for all these race conditions in my mma8452-next branch. /Esben