Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] firmware: arm_ffa: check pkvm initailised when initailise ffa driver

On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 12:12:44PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> > On Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:34:30 +0100,
> > Yeoreum Yun <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > @@ -2035,6 +2037,16 @@ static int __init ffa_init(void)
> > > > >  	u32 buf_sz;
> > > > >  	size_t rxtx_bufsz = SZ_4K;
> > > > >
> > > > > +	/*
> > > > > +	 * When pKVM is enabled, the FF-A driver must be initialized
> > > > > +	 * after pKVM initialization. Otherwise, pKVM cannot negotiate
> > > > > +	 * the FF-A version or obtain RX/TX buffer information,
> > > > > +	 * which leads to failures in FF-A calls.
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) && is_protected_kvm_enabled() &&
> > > > > +	    !is_kvm_arm_initialised())
> > > > > +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > That's still fundamentally wrong: pkvm is not ready until
> > > > finalize_pkvm() has finished, and that's not indicated by
> > > > is_kvm_arm_initialised().
> > >
> > > Thanks. I miss the TSC bit set in here.
> >
> > That's the least of the problems. None of the infrastructure is in
> > place at this stage...
> >
> > > IMHO, I'd like to make an new state check function --
> > > is_pkvm_arm_initialised() so that ff-a driver to know whether
> > > pkvm is initialised.
> >
> > Doesn't sound great, TBH.
> >
> > > or any other suggestion?
> >
> > Instead of adding more esoteric predicates, I'd rather you build on an
> > existing infrastructure. You have a dependency on KVM, use something
> > that is designed to enforce dependencies. Device links spring to mind
> > as something designed for that.
> >
> > Can you look into enabling this for KVM? If that's possible, then it
> > should be easy enough to delay the actual KVM registration after pKVM
> > is finalised.
> 
> or what about some event notifier? Just like:

This seems a bit over-engineered to me. Why don't you just split the
FF-A initialisation into two steps: an early part which does the version
negotiation and then a later part which can fit in with whatever
dependencies you have on the TPM?

Will