Re: [PATCH 0/3] ima: add regular file data hash support for sigv3

Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-integrity
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2026-04-27 at 18:27 +0530, Kamlesh Kumar wrote:
> On 3/24/26 4:39 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > IMA signature version 3 (sigv3) support was introduced to avoid file
> > signature ambiguity. Instead of directly signing a raw fs-verity hash,
> > IMA signs the hash of ima_file_id structure, containing the type of
> > signature, the hash algorithm, and the hash.
> > 
> > Pure ML-DSA calculates and signs the hash directly rather than a
> > pre-hashed digest. To avoid ML-DSA having to re-calculate the file data
> > hash, Eric Biggers suggested signing the smaller ima_file_id structure.
> > 
> > This patch set adds the sigv3 support for regular file data hashes. A
> > subsequent patch set will add the ML-DSA support.
> > 
> > Mimi Zohar (3):
> >    ima: Define asymmetric_verify_v3() to verify IMA sigv3 signatures
> >    ima: add regular file data hash signature version 3 support
> >    ima: add support to require IMA sigv3 signatures
> > 
> >   Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy   | 10 ++--
> >   security/integrity/digsig.c            |  8 +--
> >   security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >   security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c      |  3 +-
> >   security/integrity/ima/ima.h           |  1 +
> >   security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c  | 72 ++++++++------------------
> >   security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c    | 22 ++++----
> >   security/integrity/integrity.h         | 14 ++++-
> >   8 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> > 
> 
> I have tested this series along with Stefan's ML-DSA patches [1] and an
> additional fix [2] for ima_get_hash_algo().
> With all patches applied, I am able to successfully sign files with
> ML-DSA-65 and verify IMA sigv3 signatures during appraisal.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/[email protected]/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/[email protected]/
> 
> Tested-by: Kamlesh Kumar <[email protected]>

Thanks, Kamlesh!

I'd appreciate re-testing with the v3 version now queued in next-integrity-
testing
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/[email protected]
?

Mimi
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.