Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: add bpf_init_inode_xattr kfunc for atomic inode labeling

On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 6:58 PM David Windsor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 8:55 AM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
> >
> >   kfunc bpf_init_inode_xattr(...)
> >   {
> >     /* sanity check params */
> >     if (!xattrs ...)
> >       return -EINVAL;
> >
> >    /* get value/len from bpf dynptr */
> >
> >    /* hook will check for LSM specific xattr count/limits, allocate,
> > copy value*/
> >    rc = security_lsmxattr_add(xattrs, LSM_ID_BPF, value, value_len);
> >    if (rc)
> >      return rc;
> >   }
> >
> > David, if you like I can provide you a patch that implements the
> > security_lsmxattr_add() hook above if you aren't comfortable writing
> > that, but if you want to give it a shot that's all the better :)
>
> Makes sense, I can do it while I'm fixing the remaining issue flagged
> by sashiko.
>
> I'll route the LSM preparation patch containing struct lsm_xattrs and
> security_lsmxattr_add() through security and the kfunc and selftest
> through bpf. Does that work for you?

Yep.

-- 
paul-moore.com