Re: [PATCH] scripts: headers_install.sh: Normalize __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__
Nicolas Schier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ai0tYULNorM5UDqd@levanger> |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 08:58:08PM +0100, Thomas WeiÃschuh wrote: > On 2026-03-24 11:35:01-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 06:05:34PM +0100, Thomas WeiÃschuh wrote: > > > On 2026-03-13 16:56:18-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > It sounds like the "< GCC 3.0" part of that might not be true based on > > > > Maciej's research? > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]/ > > > > > > Yes, indeed. In my opinion the consistency aspect is still sufficient > > > to have this change. What do you think? > > > > Yes, I think so. Will you keep it as going from __ASSEMBLY__ to > > __ASSEMBLER__? It probably makes more sense that way given there should > > be no regressions on the compiler side and that is the intended end > > result? > > I would have stuck to the old name '__ASSEMBLY__', just for robustness > and because we are late in the cycle. > Then we can switch it early in the next cycle. What's the state with this? Shall this show up in linux-next early this cycle? -- Nicolas