Re: [PATCH] scripts: headers_install.sh: Normalize __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__
Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260613165738.GA3152432@ax162> |
On Sat, Jun 13, 2026 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Nicolas Schier wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 08:58:08PM +0100, Thomas WeiÃschuh wrote: > > On 2026-03-24 11:35:01-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 06:05:34PM +0100, Thomas WeiÃschuh wrote: > > > > On 2026-03-13 16:56:18-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > It sounds like the "< GCC 3.0" part of that might not be true based on > > > > > Maciej's research? > > > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]/ > > > > > > > > Yes, indeed. In my opinion the consistency aspect is still sufficient > > > > to have this change. What do you think? > > > > > > Yes, I think so. Will you keep it as going from __ASSEMBLY__ to > > > __ASSEMBLER__? It probably makes more sense that way given there should > > > be no regressions on the compiler side and that is the intended end > > > result? > > > > I would have stuck to the old name '__ASSEMBLY__', just for robustness > > and because we are late in the cycle. > > Then we can switch it early in the next cycle. > > What's the state with this? Shall this show up in linux-next early this > cycle? This fell off my radar. I think the commit message needs some small updates based on my review upthread but once resent, we should be able to take it when 7.2-rc1 is out? -- Cheers, Nathan