Re: [PATCH] scripts: headers_install.sh: Normalize __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__

Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <20260613165738.GA3152432@ax162>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2026 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 08:58:08PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2026-03-24 11:35:01-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 06:05:34PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > On 2026-03-13 16:56:18-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > > > It sounds like the "< GCC 3.0" part of that might not be true based on
> > > > > Maciej's research?
> > > > > 
> > > > >   https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]/
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, indeed. In my opinion the consistency aspect is still sufficient
> > > > to have this change. What do you think?
> > > 
> > > Yes, I think so. Will you keep it as going from __ASSEMBLY__ to
> > > __ASSEMBLER__? It probably makes more sense that way given there should
> > > be no regressions on the compiler side and that is the intended end
> > > result?
> > 
> > I would have stuck to the old name '__ASSEMBLY__', just for robustness
> > and because we are late in the cycle.
> > Then we can switch it early in the next cycle.
> 
> What's the state with this?  Shall this show up in linux-next early this
> cycle?

This fell off my radar. I think the commit message needs some small
updates based on my review upthread but once resent, we should be able
to take it when 7.2-rc1 is out?

-- 
Cheers,
Nathan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.