Re: [PATCH] rust: Kbuild: set frame-pointer llvm module flag for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER

Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,dev.linux.lists.llvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.rust-for-linux
Message-ID <CAH5fLgjqVxoBVdoSG40vE2uqybeC3zvgi7T_fTA1=HwFY010Hw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 3:34 PM Miguel Ojeda
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 2:30 PM Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Fixes: 2f7ab1267dc9 ("Kbuild: add Rust support")
>
> For 6.1.y, we use Rust 1.62.0, so we don't have `-Zllvm_module_flag`,
> so we cannot go that far back. I guess we will need to accept the
> issue there.
>
> For 6.6.y, we use Rust 1.73.0, so we don't have it either.
>
> For 6.12.y onward, we support Rust 1.78.0, so it is fine --
> `-Zllvm_module_flag` got added in Rust 1.76.0.
>
> In both 6.1.y and 6.6.y, we also don't have `rustc-min-version`,
> because the version is pinned there. That part happens to work,
> though, just due to how lax Make is... However, if the flag had been
> available, then we should probably still do it cleanly with a custom
> patch to avoid confusion.
>
> So I will instead do:
>
> Cc: [email protected] # 6.12.y and later (flag not available in
> pinned Rust in older LTSs).

Ah, I didn't know it was so new. That makes sense, thanks.

Alice
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.