Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Add CONFIG_TRA CE_PRINTK_DEBUGGING to clean up kernel.h
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Jun 2026 11:38:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On June 21, 2026 11:13:00 AM GMT+01:00, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sun, Jun 21 2026 at 05:34, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> Instead of having trace_printk.h included in kernel.h, create a config >> TRACE_PRINTK_DEBUGGING that when set will update the CFLAGS in the >> Makefile to allow developers to add trace_printk() without the need to add >> the include for it. Having it included in the Makefile keeps it from being >> in the dependency chain and it will not waste extra CPU cycles for those >> building the kernel without using trace_printk. > >IOW, you make it worse just because. > >With the header being separate I add the three trace_printk()s and the >include to the source file I'm investigating. The recompile will build >exactly this source file. > >Having to enable the config knob will result in a full kernel rebuild >for no value. > >Seriously? Like having lockdep enabled, this would always be set in the development environment. It's not something to only enable when you need to add a trace_printk. If you don't want to rebuild everything, by all means add the include file by file. There's nothing preventing you to do that with this solution. -- Steve P.S. I'm replying on my phone as I'm in the London Tube. Thus why I'm not trimming my email. > >Thanks, > > tglx >