Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing: Move trace_printk.h out of kernel.h
Yury Norov <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:11:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ajk0lT9P0SeuD94j@yury> |
On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 09:08:26AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:05:13 +0200 > "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There's been complaints about trace_printk() being defined in kernel.h as it > > > can increase the compilation time. As it is only used by some developers for > > > debugging purposes, it should not be in kernel.h causing lots of wasted CPU > > > cycles for those that do not ever care about it. > > > > Do we have a measurement of the increased compilation time ? > > I believe Yury does. I re-run compilation is a more strict environment, and the difference is negligible.