Re: [PATCH] kconfig: warn on dead default
Nicolas Schier <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:06:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <akyXZylHRRgzzpDk@levanger> |
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:31:43PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On Sat, Jun 06, 2026 at 03:00:08PM +0100, Julian Braha wrote: > > The dead default check was originally introduced with kconfirm: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > > > While I'm still working on that tool, it's not yet ready for inclusion > > into the tree. I am currently waiting for common distro packagers to > > package the parsing library before submitting the next RFC iteration. > > > > However, the dead default check is more impactful than the other checks: > > all 4 dead defaults that were detected should not have been dead and could > > cause misconfiguration bugs. But fortunately, these were just for kunit > > tests. The 3 patches to fix them have all since been merged: > > commit aef656a0e6c0 ("powerpc: fix dead default for GUEST_STATE_BUFFER_TEST") > > commit 30cc5e2ad826 ("s390/Kconfig: Cleanup defaults for selftests") > > commit df75430515c3 ("drm: fix dead default for DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST") > > > > We can actually check for dead defaults while evaluating Kconfig, which > > should be even more effective at preventing future instances than keeping > > it in a static checker. > > > > Note that this patch will only trigger a warning when the default values > > are different, in other words, pure duplicate defaults won't cause a > > warning, as they are simply redundant. > > > > Signed-off-by: Julian Braha <[email protected]> > > Nicolas pushed this into -next, where it fires several times for me. I > have not looked at these closely yet, I just wanted to get the report > out so that more eyes could be on it. > > ARCH=powerpc allmodconfig: > > arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:269:warning: default for 'TUNE_CPU' has the same condition as the earlier default at arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:268 > arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:270:warning: default for 'TUNE_CPU' has the same condition as the earlier default at arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:268 > lib/Kconfig.debug:1083:warning: default for 'PANIC_TIMEOUT' is unreachable: earlier default at arch/powerpc/Kconfig:350 is unconditional > arch/Kconfig:1194:warning: default for 'PGTABLE_LEVELS' is unreachable: earlier default at arch/powerpc/Kconfig:482 is unconditional > > ARCH=s390 allmodconfig: > > arch/Kconfig:1194:warning: default for 'PGTABLE_LEVELS' is unreachable: earlier default at arch/s390/Kconfig:295 is unconditional > lib/Kconfig:372:warning: default for 'HAS_IOMEM' is unreachable: earlier default at arch/s390/Kconfig:760 is unconditional > > When building with clang-23, which supports '-fms-anonymous-struct': > > init/Kconfig:978:warning: default for 'CC_MS_EXTENSIONS' is unreachable: earlier default at init/Kconfig:977 is unconditional > > I think the init/Kconfig and arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype ones > are intentional due to how cc-option works but I know those might be > hard to silence because they are already evaluated by this stage if I > understand correctly? Not sure about the other ones (apologies if they > are already known or have fixes). thanks for the report. I'll remove the patch from kbuild-for-next again as there is not obvious immediate solution visible to me right now. -- Nicolas