Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add delegated channel request helpers
Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <pzeysikhd2mdblpn3hbl3fsiehmgwcogbep6f4btr65he5jb4t@mdas7wsvkrtp> |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 11:50:33AM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 12:45:13PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 01:47:45PM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 11:05:21AM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 11:23:47AM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:38:53PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote: > > > > > > Endpoint functions that expose endpoint-local DesignWare eDMA channels > > > > > > to a remote host need to reserve exact hardware channels and hand > > > > > > interrupt ownership to the remote side before publishing the channels. > > > > > > > > > > > > Add DW eDMA-specific helpers that request a write/read hardware channel > > > > > > through DMAengine, keep the hardware-channel filter private to dw-edma, > > > > > > and switch the selected endpoint-local channel to remote interrupt > > > > > > routing after the channel has been successfully reserved. The matching > > > > > > release helper can quiesce the channel while it is still remote-routed, > > > > > > then restores the channel's default routing before releasing the > > > > > > DMAengine reservation. This lets callers skip quiesce when unwinding a > > > > > > reservation that was never exposed to host programming. > > > > > > > > > > > > Release is best-effort because its callers cannot abort teardown. Report > > > > > > a quiesce failure locally, but always restore the default routing and > > > > > > release the DMAengine reservation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Changes in v6: > > > > > > - No changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > include/linux/dma/edma.h | 14 +++++ > > > > > > 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c > > > > > > index 1f893dc54c79..4c0d2bba755b 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c > > > > > > @@ -1302,6 +1302,97 @@ int dw_edma_remove(struct dw_edma_chip *chip) > > > > > > } > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_edma_remove); > > > > > > > > > > > > +struct dw_edma_delegated_chan_filter_args { > > > > > > + struct device *dma_dev; > > > > > > + bool write; > > > > > > + u16 id; > > > > > > +}; > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static bool dw_edma_delegated_chan_filter(struct dma_chan *dchan, void *param) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct dw_edma_delegated_chan_filter_args *filter = param; > > > > > > + struct dw_edma_chan *chan; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (!filter || dchan->device->dev != filter->dma_dev) > > > > > > + return false; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + chan = dchan2dw_edma_chan(dchan); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + return chan->dir == (filter->write ? EDMA_DIR_WRITE : EDMA_DIR_READ) && > > > > > > + chan->id == filter->id; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static int dw_edma_delegate_chan(struct dma_chan *dchan) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct dw_edma_chan *chan = dchan2dw_edma_chan(dchan); > > > > > > + int ret = 0; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (!(chan->dw->chip->flags & DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL)) > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&chan->vc.lock); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (chan->configured || chan->status != EDMA_ST_IDLE || > > > > > > + chan->request != EDMA_REQ_NONE) > > > > > > + ret = -EBUSY; > > > > > > + else > > > > > > + chan->irq_mode = DW_EDMA_CH_IRQ_REMOTE; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + return ret; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > +struct dma_chan *dw_edma_request_delegated_chan(struct device *dma_dev, > > > > > > + bool write, u16 id) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct dw_edma_delegated_chan_filter_args filter = { > > > > > > + .dma_dev = dma_dev, > > > > > > + .write = write, > > > > > > + .id = id, > > > > > > + }; > > > > > > + struct dma_chan *dchan; > > > > > > + dma_cap_mask_t mask; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (!dma_dev) > > > > > > + return NULL; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + dma_cap_zero(mask); > > > > > > + dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + dchan = dma_request_channel(mask, dw_edma_delegated_chan_filter, > > > > > > + &filter); > > > > > > + if (!dchan) > > > > > > + return NULL; > > > > > > > > > > I forget, why need export delegrated dma channel to dmanegine? If EP > > > > > driver doesn't report delegrated channel to dma engine, what's happen? > > > > > > > > This just reserves the exact channel against any dmaengine clients before > > > > handing its programming ownership to the host. Without it, a local client > > > > could request the same channel too. > > > > > > why not epf function driver call dma_request_channel() to decide which > > > channel pass to ownership to the host. > > > > I actually tried that model in v2. pci_epf_dma called dma_request_channel() with > > a filter supplied through the EPC resource. > > > > In v2, .filter_fn was part of the pci_epc_aux_resource definition: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ > > ... and pci_epf_dma_claim_channel() used it to claim the channel here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ > > > > I changed that in v3 after your comment about why the dw-edma filter needed to > > be public. The replacement kept the filter inside dw-edma, and moved channel > > reservation, IRQ ownership handoff and reclaim there too. The current EPC > > delegation API follows that model. > > > > Or is that v2 model what you prefer here? > > > > That said, dma_get_slave_channel() might be sufficient inside dw-edma here, > > since it already knows the exact channel from the direction and hw channel id. > > > > P.S. For clarity, the options tried or discussed so far are: > > > > (a) Expose dma_chan directly through the EPC resource, then let the EPF > > reserve it with dma_get_slave_channel(). This was v1. > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/) > > > > (b) Expose the hardware ID, direction and a provider filter, then let the > > EPF call dma_request_channel(). This was v2. > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/) > > > > (c) Pass the hardware ID and direction to pci_epc_delegate_dma_chan(), then > > let the backend reserve and delegate the channel. This is the current > > v6 design. > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/) > > > > (d) Request channels normally and correlate them with EPC resources through > > a generic dma_slave_caps.hw_id. I proposed this in a much older series. > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/) > > Thank you for your great work, let me read and feedback to you, do you have > irc, discord or other instance message channel. Hi, sorry about late response. Would matrix work for you? I'm @koichiroden. I'm in UTC+0900 (Japan Standard Time), by the way. Best regards, Koichiro > > Frank > > > > > Best regards, > > Koichiro > > > > > > > > Frank > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Koichiro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Frank > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (dw_edma_delegate_chan(dchan)) { > > > > > > + dma_release_channel(dchan); > > > > > > + return NULL; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + return dchan; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_edma_request_delegated_chan); > > > > > > + > > > > > > +void dw_edma_release_delegated_chan(struct dma_chan *dchan, bool quiesce) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct dw_edma_chan *chan; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (!dchan) > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + chan = dchan2dw_edma_chan(dchan); > > > > > > + if (quiesce && dw_edma_core_ch_quiesce(chan)) > > > > > > + dev_warn(chan->dw->chip->dev, > > > > > > + "failed to quiesce delegated %s channel %u\n", > > > > > > + chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE ? "write" : "read", > > > > > > + chan->id); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &chan->vc.lock) > > > > > > + chan->irq_mode = dw_edma_get_default_irq_mode(chan); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + dma_release_channel(dchan); > > > > > > +} > > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_edma_release_delegated_chan); > > > > > > + > > > > > > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > > > > > > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Synopsys DesignWare eDMA controller core driver"); > > > > > > MODULE_AUTHOR("Gustavo Pimentel <[email protected]>"); > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h > > > > > > index 3c8e2ef9dee0..944469258b8b 100644 > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h > > > > > > @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ struct dw_edma_chip { > > > > > > #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_DW_EDMA) > > > > > > int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip); > > > > > > int dw_edma_remove(struct dw_edma_chip *chip); > > > > > > +struct dma_chan *dw_edma_request_delegated_chan(struct device *dma_dev, > > > > > > + bool write, u16 id); > > > > > > +void dw_edma_release_delegated_chan(struct dma_chan *chan, bool quiesce); > > > > > > #else > > > > > > static inline int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip) > > > > > > { > > > > > > @@ -163,6 +166,17 @@ static inline int dw_edma_remove(struct dw_edma_chip *chip) > > > > > > { > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > } > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static inline struct dma_chan * > > > > > > +dw_edma_request_delegated_chan(struct device *dma_dev, bool write, u16 id) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + return NULL; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static inline void dw_edma_release_delegated_chan(struct dma_chan *chan, > > > > > > + bool quiesce) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > +} > > > > > > #endif /* CONFIG_DW_EDMA */ > > > > > > > > > > > > #endif /* _DW_EDMA_H */ > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 2.51.0 > > > > > >