Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: stmmac: dwxgmac2: add XGMAC timestamp interrupt support
Maxime Chevallier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+Nazim On 8/12/26 14:59, Zxyan Zhu wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On 8/12/26 5:10 PM, Maxime Chevallier wrote: >> If there's an interrupt storm, then this should probably be a fix for -net >> with a Fixes tag. > > There is no interrupt storm. XGMAC_TSIE was never enabled before this > patch (XGMAC_INT_DEFAULT_EN was LPIIE | PMTIE only), and > dwxgmac2_host_irq_status() masks the status with the enable mask, so > XGMAC_INT_TSIS could never fire. The actual symptom is that > auxiliary-snapshot extts events were never reported -- a feature that > was never wired up, not a live interrupt storm. Ah indeed, quite the opposite then. > > So I'd like to keep this on net-next as a new feature rather than > retarget it to net. Yes makes sense indeed. Can you take a look at the sashiko-reported issues, it spots that this could interfere with the timestamping on agilex5 (another XGMAC platform) : https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260810100221.9166-1-zxyan0222%40gmail.com Maybe there's some stuff that could be made more generic by moving them out of the socfpga code and putting it in the more generic timestamping code ? I don't have any xgmac boards to verify sashiko's claim though. > > Thanks, > Zxyan >