Re: [PATCH] erofs: fix EROFS_FS_ZIP_LZMA_DEFAULT_MAX_STREAMS on some UP platforms

Hi Geert,

On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 10:43:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Gao,
> 

...

> > > >
> > > > In principle, that would be better, but may I ask if there is some
> > > > severe consequences out of one extra line of
> > > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP_LZMA_DEFAULT_MAX_STREAMS=1?
> > > >
> > > > Since it has been fixed for many times, I hope if it could be improved
> > > > later if no severe impacts, sigh..
> > >
> > > It causes more churn (defconfig updates), and makes the defconfig
> > > files larger than needed.
> >
> > Could you submit a formal patch directly (since you found it and
> > suggested a version)?
> >
> > so I could submit it along with the pull request if you're fine with it.
> 
> Will do, I want to do a bit more testing first...

Ok, anyway, I will try to submit a PR hours later.
if there is a patch, the worst case is that it's included in
the follow-up pull request.

> In addition, usability can be improved by hiding the prompt on UP
> systems:
> 
> -       int "EROFS LZMA default maximum decompression streams"
> +       int "EROFS LZMA default maximum decompression streams" if SMP
> 

I hope CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP_LZMA_DEFAULT_MAX_STREAMS is a user-visible
configuration (and the Kconfig text helps too) no matter the platform
is UP or not (but it can be omitted in .config) even there is the only
one choice in menuconfig for example on UP platforms.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang 

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> -- 
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds
>