Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clk: qcom: gcc-glymur: Tie the CX power domain to controller
Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <qy4dstdfwguaalr6ildd5esrskx6yxi2zga2my7m32dtx4icne@n6moblldqii5> |
On 26-08-17 12:10:06, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 8/14/26 8:30 AM, Pankaj Patil wrote: > > On 7/15/2026 6:59 PM, Abel Vesa wrote: > >> The suggestion of having the CX power domain tied up to the GCC > >> controller started here: > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ > >> > >> and then, for Glymur, it has been brought up here as well: > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > >> > >> These plus a discussion off-list led to this patchset being done. > >> > > > > This series prevents cx collapse during suspend on recent linux-next tag: next-20260806 > > Reproducible on latest tag next-20260813 as well > > Yes and the ""fix"" is to disable the GPU nodes because the custom > runtime pm dance done in the gxclkctl driver keeps a vote online I can confirm that disable GPU related nodes does allow CX to collapse. Had a conversation with Taniya last week (off-list) about this. I think there was a recent fix from Akhil that was supposed to fix the GMU recovery, which will allow us to drop the pm_runtime_disable() from gxclkctl. Taniya ? Akhil ?