[PATCH net v8 02/12] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length

rxrpc_send_data() is given two data lengths (len and msg->msg_iter.count)
and is inconsistent about how it uses them.  Fix this by using len in
preference to msg->msg_iter.count.  Also limit the amount copied to either
len or msg->msg_iter.count, whichever is smaller.

Note that, currently, all the callers have len and msg->msg_iter.count the
same and so the problem won't occur.

Fixes: 382d7974de31 ("RxRPC: Use iov_iter_count() in rxrpc_send_data() instead of the len argument")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
cc: Marc Dionne <[email protected]>
cc: Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]>
cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
cc: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
---
 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 1d66e9808162..565799548102 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 
 	ret = -EMSGSIZE;
 	if (call->tx_total_len != -1) {
-		if (len - copied > call->tx_total_len)
+		if (len > call->tx_total_len)
 			goto maybe_error;
-		if (!more && len - copied != call->tx_total_len)
+		if (!more && len != call->tx_total_len)
 			goto maybe_error;
 	}
 
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 			 * the security header is going to be in the padded
 			 * region (enc blocksize), but the trailer is not.
 			 */
-			remain = more ? INT_MAX : msg_data_left(msg);
+			remain = more ? INT_MAX : len;
 			txb = call->conn->security->alloc_txbuf(call, remain, sk->sk_allocation);
 			if (!txb) {
 				ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -416,8 +416,8 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 		_debug("append");
 
 		/* append next segment of data to the current buffer */
-		if (msg_data_left(msg) > 0) {
-			size_t copy = umin(txb->space, msg_data_left(msg));
+		if (len > 0) {
+			size_t copy = min3(txb->space, len, msg_data_left(msg));
 
 			_debug("add %zu", copy);
 			if (!copy_from_iter_full(txb->data + txb->offset,
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 			txb->len += copy;
 			txb->offset += copy;
 			copied += copy;
+			len -= copy;
 			if (call->tx_total_len != -1)
 				call->tx_total_len -= copy;
 		}
@@ -439,8 +440,8 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 
 		/* add the packet to the send queue if it's now full */
 		if (!txb->space ||
-		    (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)) {
-			if (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)
+		    (len == 0 && !more)) {
+			if (len == 0 && !more)
 				txb->flags |= RXRPC_LAST_PACKET;
 
 			ret = call->security->secure_packet(call, txb);
@@ -449,7 +450,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 			rxrpc_queue_packet(rx, call, txb, notify_end_tx);
 			txb = NULL;
 		}
-	} while (msg_data_left(msg) > 0);
+	} while (len > 0 && msg_data_left(msg) > 0);
 
 success:
 	ret = copied;