Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Defer sched domain rebuild to common unlock path

Ridong Chen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.cgroups
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 9/18/2026 6:27 PM, Guopeng Zhang wrote:
> From: Guopeng Zhang <[email protected]>
> 
> Both callers of update_prstate(), cpuset_partition_write() and
> cpuset_css_killed(), call cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock() immediately
> afterwards. That helper rebuilds sched domains when force_sd_rebuild is
> set before releasing the cpuset locks, so the check in update_prstate()
> is redundant.
> 
> Commit 3bfe47967191 ("cgroup/cpuset: Move
> housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together") removed the
> same check from cpuset_write_resmask(). Remove the remaining one from
> update_prstate().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <[email protected]>
> ---
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 --
>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 8f24171..d58ecf5 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -3039,8 +3039,6 @@ out:
>   	update_partition_sd_lb(cs, old_prs);
>   
>   	notify_partition_change(cs, old_prs);
> -	if (force_sd_rebuild)
> -		rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
>   	free_tmpmasks(&tmpmask);
>   	return 0;
>   }

This title is confusing. I thought you were doing some async work, what does 
"defer" mean here? In fact, it just removes a piece of redundant code.

-- 
Best regards
Ridong
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.