Re: [PATCH] selftests/efivarfs: skip write tests if efivarfs is mounted read-only
"Ard Biesheuvel" <[email protected]> Sat, 01 Aug 2026 15:50:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Hui Wang,
On Mon, 8 Jun 2026, at 13:13, Hui Wang wrote:
> efivarfs is mounted read-only when the firmware does not provide a
> working runtime SetVariable() service. This happens, for example, on
> systems where the EFI runtime is provided by U-Boot's efi_loader (a
> common case on RISC-V under QEMU booting via OpenSBI -> U-Boot -> GRUB),
> or when runtime services are disabled (efi=noruntime, lockdown, etc).
>
> In that situation every test that creates, modifies or deletes an EFI
> variable is bound to fail, producing spurious test failures that do not
> reflect a real kernel bug.
>
> Detect the mount mode in check_prereqs() and store it in the global
> efivarfs_mode ("ro" or "rw"). Extend run_test() to take an optional
> "rw" argument marking tests that require a writable efivarfs; such tests
> are reported as [SKIP] (instead of being run and failing) when efivarfs
> is read-only, along with an explanatory message.
>
> test_create_empty and test_invalid_filenames are left to run
> unconditionally, since their expectation still holds on a read-only
> mount; their stderr is silenced to avoid noise from the read-only
> redirection failures.
>
> Assisted-by: Copilot:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/efivarfs/efivarfs.sh | 44 +++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/efivarfs/efivarfs.sh
> b/tools/testing/selftests/efivarfs/efivarfs.sh
> index c62544b966ae..d8883fdf3b01 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/efivarfs/efivarfs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/efivarfs/efivarfs.sh
> @@ -26,16 +26,33 @@ check_prereqs()
> echo $msg efivarfs is not mounted on $efivarfs_mount >&2
> exit $ksft_skip
> fi
> +
> + # Determine whether efivarfs is mounted read-only or read-write
> + # and store the result ("ro" or "rw") in the global efivarfs_mode.
> + if grep -q "^\S\+ $efivarfs_mount efivarfs ro[, ]" /proc/mounts; then
> + efivarfs_mode=ro
> + else
> + efivarfs_mode=rw
> + fi
> }
>
> run_test()
> {
> local test="$1"
> + # Second (optional) argument: "rw" if the test needs a writable
> + # efivarfs. Such tests are skipped when efivarfs is mounted read-only.
> + local need_rw="$2"
>
> echo "--------------------"
> echo "running $test"
> echo "--------------------"
>
> + if [ "$need_rw" = "rw" ] && [ "$efivarfs_mode" = "ro" ]; then
> + echo " [SKIP] efivarfs is mounted read-only," \
> + "skipping test that requires write access" >&2
> + return
> + fi
> +
> if [ "$(type -t $test)" = 'function' ]; then
> ( $test )
> else
> @@ -74,7 +91,7 @@ test_create_empty()
> {
> local file=$efivarfs_mount/$FUNCNAME-$test_guid
>
> - : > $file
> + : 2>/dev/null > $file
>
> if [ -e $file ]; then
> echo "$file can be created without writing" >&2
> @@ -361,18 +378,23 @@ check_prereqs
>
> rc=0
>
> -run_test test_create
> +if [ "$efivarfs_mode" = "ro" ]; then
> + echo "efivarfs is mounted read-only on $efivarfs_mount;" \
> + "tests that require write access will be skipped" >&2
> +fi
> +
> +run_test test_create rw
> run_test test_create_empty
> -run_test test_create_read
> -run_test test_delete
> -run_test test_zero_size_delete
> -run_test test_open_unlink
> -run_test test_valid_filenames
> +run_test test_create_read rw
> +run_test test_delete rw
> +run_test test_zero_size_delete rw
> +run_test test_open_unlink rw
> +run_test test_valid_filenames rw
> run_test test_invalid_filenames
> -run_test test_no_set_size
> +run_test test_no_set_size rw
> setup_test_multiple
> -run_test test_multiple_zero_size
> -run_test test_multiple_create
> -run_test test_multiple_delete_on_write
> +run_test test_multiple_zero_size rw
> +run_test test_multiple_create rw
> +run_test test_multiple_delete_on_write rw
>
This looks rather messy to me. Can't you have the rw tests in
a single if scope that is only entered when the mount is rw?