Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Fix inactive SVE and SSVE regsets
Will Deacon <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Aug 2026 13:20:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anR78qO5RGalbFNo@willie-the-truck> |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:15:25PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 10:27:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > As noted in the changelog applying patch 1 as a fix and this only for > > > -next blows up the fp-ptrace test rather impressively in any > > > configuration which can generate headers only reports: > > > > https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/3075737#L3231 > > > > for the release. Both patches really do need to go together. > > > By "blows up" you mean the test fails, right? That's the same behaviour > > if anybody runs the test on a kernel without the fix. Both patches are > > merged in for-next/core. > > Right, the test starts reporting 96 fails which doesn't look great in a > dashboard. I'd misread the original branch as being merged as a fix but > I see it's not been merged into the fixes branch, sorry for the > confusion. No problem, thank you for running the tests :) Will