Re: [PATCH 0/4] selftests/resctrl: MBA schemata ABI selftests for MPAM platforms

Richard Cheng <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <aoQ75dI9W214sOEe@MWDK4CY14F>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 10:58:07AM +0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> On 7/21/26 7:10 PM, Richard Cheng wrote:
> > The MPAM MBA enablement carried in this tree exposes memory-bandwidth
> 
> "this tree"?
> 
> > allocation through the resctrl "MB" schemata, but none of it is covered
> > by the in-tree resctrl selftests: the existing mba_test/mbm_test are
> 
> ...
> 
> > The tests are written upstream-shaped for eventual submission.
> 
> "eventual" hints that this submission was not intended?
> 
> > 
> > This series applies on top of the 26.04_linux-nvidia.glue.others.
> > cpu_less.hardlimit branch of
> > https://github.com/fyu1/NV-Kernels.fenghuay.baseos
> "this tree" referred to by first sentence?
> 
> I peeked at the first test and it seems to rely on features that do not
> exist in upstream resctrl, for example an info file named "schema_format".
> 
> Considering all this I do not see this as a valid upstream submission.
> 
> These tests do seem useful though. When they are ready, please submit
> against "next" branch of
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Reinette
>

Sorry about that, please ignore this for now, I'll redraft later.

Best regards,
Richard Cheng.
 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.