Re: [PATCH 4/4] selftest/arm64: Add MTE test config fragment

Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 09:55:44AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 04:33:26PM +0100, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:

> > +CONFIG_SYSFS=y
> > +CONFIG_TMPFS=y

> These are all covered by defconfig. Are these fragments still necessary?
> Or are they supposed to work on custom configs? If the latter EXPERT may
> be set, hence the PROC_SYSCTL above. You probably also need SHMEM.

In theory, yes since people might not run defconfig and it's supposed to
show what's needed for the tests.  In practice people don't usually
bother, especially not for things like those which are going to be on in
any reasonable config.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmqIOLIACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9COAwf/T/9AZMQTnBsmw6u0/45ObTEmP024W7EPWkw2fMtMwk2Avr0iXoVMPnCW
Rc3A1eeuN+qDeaM1ahCcAW8t1Kknh6ptUeRNyMHaoJqQXAZuEl2cf7vosm2s7NXm
gxwnamyHYZtRr3l+T+vl4MmThq5gES7Yo33PvQHmuc7eV/+pVHMFWzP7fzZB7DhJ
2YOdsXG3uqYA0fNNyW+0Vg8ST7hEyBdh5WaOz2QBe5FHnFiklsIVKA1JA9mXlhs+
jZh17TPWHOezx1GCDv8E8BjeRzUO2fdDYcX6uIFBZoN7cZaKHb8461+gYOdbyHr5
ERqSjHd9HRey5Gt85AiEv32nBDgoNg==
=F2rd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.