Re: [PATCH v19 06/14] KVM: arm64: Validate GCS exception lock when emulating ERET

Wei-Lin Chang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <vdmz43ogvmwu4liilfqzdrgsf5v765bucl7mybhfdxj7yrywkd@5mssukdegdwg>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 08:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> As per DDI0487 R_TYTWB GCS adds an additional case where an illegal
> exception return can be generated. If all of:
> 
>  - PSTATE.EXLOCK is 0.
>  - The EL is not being changed by the ERET.
>  - GCSCR_ELx.EXLOCKEN is 1.
> 
> are true then the return is illegal. Emulate this behaviour when
> emulating ERET for nested guests, while we're at it using the symbolic
> definition for EXLOCK in SPSR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c     |  5 ++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c     |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> index 012d711034d1..f25ddee89206 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> @@ -240,6 +240,45 @@ static inline bool kvm_auth_eretax(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *elr)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_GCS
> +/*
> + * A subset of the pseudocode ELFromSPSR(), validity checks are
> + * assumed to have been done in code that is not GCS specific.
> + */
> +static inline int exlock_el_from_spsr(u64 spsr)
> +{
> +	return FIELD_GET(GENMASK(3, 2), spsr);
> +}

It feels a bit odd to me to have this function named exlock specific, as
it's just spsr_to_el, right?

Thanks,
Wei-Lin Chang

> +
> +/* See IllegalExceptionReturn() pseudocode */
> +static inline bool kvm_check_illegal_exlock_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +						   u64 spsr)
> +{
> +	u64 cur_el, target_el;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_has_gcs(vcpu->kvm))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate & PSR_EXLOCK_BIT)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	cur_el = exlock_el_from_spsr(vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate);
> +	target_el = exlock_el_from_spsr(spsr);
> +
> +	if (cur_el != target_el)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, GCSCR_EL2) & GCSCR_ELx_EXLOCKEN;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static inline bool kvm_check_illegal_exlock_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +						   u64 spsr)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #define KVM_NV_GUEST_MAP_SZ	(KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_SW1 | KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_SW0)
>  
>  static inline u64 kvm_encode_nested_level(struct kvm_s2_trans *trans)

[...]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.