[PATCH bpf-next v7 3/9] bpf, x86: refactor BPF_ST management in do_jit

In order to prepare for KASAN checks insertion before every
memory-related load or store, group all BPF_ST instructions that indeed
access memory in a single helper to allow instrumenting those in one
call, rather than having to instrument all cases individually.

Acked-by: Ihor Solodrai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v7:
- align dst_reg type with same type as other emit helpers
- fix line wrapping
- add missing doc on top of new helper
- remove unneeded cast

Changes in v3:
- new patch
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 48429fae0641..13ba3232993a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1315,6 +1315,63 @@ static void emit_st_index(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 index_reg, int
 	*pprog = prog;
 }
 
+/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
+static void emit_st(u8 **pprog, struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 dst_reg,
+		    s32 outgoing_arg_base, u16 outgoing_rsp)
+{
+	s32 imm32 = insn->imm;
+	u8 *prog = *pprog;
+	s32 insn_off;
+
+	switch (BPF_SIZE(insn->code)) {
+	case BPF_B:
+		if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
+			EMIT2(0x41, 0xC6);
+		else
+			EMIT1(0xC6);
+		break;
+	case BPF_H:
+		if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
+			EMIT3(0x66, 0x41, 0xC7);
+		else
+			EMIT2(0x66, 0xC7);
+		break;
+	case BPF_W:
+		if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
+			EMIT2(0x41, 0xC7);
+		else
+			EMIT1(0xC7);
+		break;
+	case BPF_DW:
+		if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_PARAMS && insn->off == -8) {
+			/* Arg 6: store immediate in r9 register */
+			emit_mov_imm64(&prog, X86_REG_R9, imm32 >> 31, imm32);
+			*pprog = prog;
+			return;
+		}
+		EMIT2(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), 0xC7);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	insn_off = insn->off;
+	if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_PARAMS) {
+		/*
+		 * Args 7+: reverse BPF negative offsets to
+		 * x86 positive rsp offsets.
+		 * BPF off=-16 → [rsp+0], off=-24 → [rsp+8], ...
+		 */
+		insn_off = outgoing_arg_base - outgoing_rsp - insn_off - 16;
+		dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP;
+	}
+	if (is_imm8(insn_off))
+		EMIT2(add_1reg(0x40, dst_reg), insn_off);
+	else
+		EMIT1_off32(add_1reg(0x80, dst_reg), insn_off);
+
+	EMIT(imm32, bpf_size_to_x86_bytes(BPF_SIZE(insn->code)));
+	*pprog = prog;
+}
+
 static void emit_st_r12(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, int off, int imm)
 {
 	emit_st_index(pprog, size, dst_reg, X86_REG_R12, off, imm);
@@ -2250,49 +2307,12 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *
 			EMIT_LFENCE();
 			break;
 
-			/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
 		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
-			if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
-				EMIT2(0x41, 0xC6);
-			else
-				EMIT1(0xC6);
-			goto st;
 		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
-			if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
-				EMIT3(0x66, 0x41, 0xC7);
-			else
-				EMIT2(0x66, 0xC7);
-			goto st;
 		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
-			if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
-				EMIT2(0x41, 0xC7);
-			else
-				EMIT1(0xC7);
-			goto st;
 		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
-			if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_PARAMS && insn->off == -8) {
-				/* Arg 6: store immediate in r9 register */
-				emit_mov_imm64(&prog, X86_REG_R9, imm32 >> 31, (u32)imm32);
-				break;
-			}
-			EMIT2(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), 0xC7);
-
-st:			insn_off = insn->off;
-			if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_PARAMS) {
-				/*
-				 * Args 7+: reverse BPF negative offsets to
-				 * x86 positive rsp offsets.
-				 * BPF off=-16 → [rsp+0], off=-24 → [rsp+8], ...
-				 */
-				insn_off = outgoing_arg_base - outgoing_rsp - insn_off - 16;
-				dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP;
-			}
-			if (is_imm8(insn_off))
-				EMIT2(add_1reg(0x40, dst_reg), insn_off);
-			else
-				EMIT1_off32(add_1reg(0x80, dst_reg), insn_off);
-
-			EMIT(imm32, bpf_size_to_x86_bytes(BPF_SIZE(insn->code)));
+			emit_st(&prog, insn, dst_reg, outgoing_arg_base,
+				outgoing_rsp);
 			break;
 
 			/* STX: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = src_reg */

-- 
2.55.0