Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] dt-bindings: leds: backlight: Convert TPS65217 to DT schema
[email protected] Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:34:26 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-leds,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-input |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] The converted MFD (Multifunction Device) core binding is incorrectly placed in the `leds/backlight/` directory. - [Low] The commit message uses an incorrect subsystem prefix for a Multifunction Device (PMIC). -- --- Patch [4]: [PATCH v4 4/4] dt-bindings: leds: backlight: Convert TPS65217 to DT schema --- commit 1f4c2bf543a28045151b5cf16c5be1f7c2cee8e1 Author: Eduard Bostina <[email protected]> dt-bindings: leds: backlight: Convert TPS65217 to DT schema This commit converts the Texas Instruments TPS65217 bindings to DT schema. It consolidates the old regulator and backlight bindings into a single schema file while documenting additional child nodes and properties. > dt-bindings: leds: backlight: Convert TPS65217 to DT schema [Severity: Low] Is the subsystem prefix correct for this device? The TPS65217 is a PMIC and its core driver resides in drivers/mfd/tps65217.c. Since this patch consolidates the bindings for a Multifunction Device into a single unified schema, should the prefix reflect the MFD subsystem instead, such as dt-bindings: mfd: ti,tps65217:? > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/ti,tps65217.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/ti,tps65217.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..4d2f4dbd2d52e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/ti,tps65217.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/backlight/ti,tps65217.yaml# [Severity: Medium] Since this schema consolidates the regulator, backlight, and other PMIC functions into a single file, should this be placed in the mfd/ directory rather than leds/backlight/? Placing it in leds/backlight/ seems to categorize the device's primary role as a dedicated backlight rather than an MFD. If moved, the id and file path would become http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/ti,tps65217.yaml#. -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=4