Re: [RFC 1/4] net: fec: do not use readl()/writel() for ColdFire
Greg Ungerer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/5/26 18:40, David Laight wrote: > On Fri, 8 May 2026 02:46:38 +0000 > Wei Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> static void >>> fec_stop(struct net_device *ndev) >>> { >>> struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev); >>> - u32 rmii_mode = readl(fep->hwp + FEC_R_CNTRL) & FEC_RCR_RMII; >>> + u32 rmii_mode = fec_readl(fep->hwp + FEC_R_CNTRL) & FEC_RCR_RMII; >> >> This is not an issue, but since you changed this line, the new code should >> follow the "reverse xmas tree" style. > > Looking rmii_mode isn't even used until much later in the function. > (and then not very often) > Much better to read it just before it is needed. Sure, but that feels like a change for a separate patch. The changes to this file are a global search and replace. The final produced object is identical before and after. Regards Greg > David > > >> >> See: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0.1/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst#L380 >> >>> u32 val; >>> >>> /* We cannot expect a graceful transmit stop without link !!! */ >>> if (fep->link) { >>> - writel(1, fep->hwp + FEC_X_CNTRL); /* Graceful transmit stop */ >>> + fec_writel(1, fep->hwp + FEC_X_CNTRL); /* Graceful transmit stop */ >>> udelay(10); >>> - if (!(readl(fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT) & FEC_ENET_GRA)) >>> + if (!(fec_readl(fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT) & FEC_ENET_GRA)) >>> netdev_err(ndev, "Graceful transmit stop did not complete!\n"); >>> } >>> >> >> >