Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] ata: pata_budda: Use named initializer for zorro_device_id
Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ahaggIq9eD8UjONu@ryzen> |
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 04:17:27PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote: > Using named initializers is more explicit and thus easier to parse for a > human. > > It's also more robust to changes in the struct definition. This robustness > is relevant for a planned change to struct zorro_device_id that replaces > .driver_data by an anonymous union. > > This change doesn't introduce changes to the compiled zorro_device_id > array. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/ata/pata_buddha.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_buddha.c b/drivers/ata/pata_buddha.c > index c36ee991d5e5..3b1f0ee2f875 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_buddha.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_buddha.c > @@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ static void pata_buddha_remove(struct zorro_dev *z) > } > > static const struct zorro_device_id pata_buddha_zorro_tbl[] = { > - { ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_BUDDHA, BOARD_BUDDHA}, > - { ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_CATWEASEL, BOARD_CATWEASEL}, > - { 0 } > + { .id = ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_BUDDHA, .driver_data = BOARD_BUDDHA }, > + { .id = ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_CATWEASEL, .driver_data = BOARD_CATWEASEL }, > + { } > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(zorro, pata_buddha_zorro_tbl); > > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int __init pata_buddha_late_init(void) > /* Manually bind to all X-Surf boards */ > while ((z = zorro_find_device(ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_X_SURF, z))) { > static struct zorro_device_id xsurf_ent = { > - ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_X_SURF, BOARD_XSURF > + .id = ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_X_SURF, .driver_data = BOARD_XSURF > }; > > pata_buddha_probe(z, &xsurf_ent); > -- > 2.47.3 > Okay for this patch to go via SCSI as suggested by Uwe in the cover-letter: Acked-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>