Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: rcar-isp: Fix VSPX reference leaks
Jacopo Mondi <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 15:43:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anCZxVjPo_zfFcEq@zed> |
Hello Linmao Li
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:05:52PM +0800, Linmao Li wrote:
> of_parse_phandle() and of_find_device_by_node() both acquire references,
> but the ISPCORE probe never releases them. The device node reference is
> leaked immediately, and the VSPX device reference is leaked on probe
> failures and on driver removal.
>
> Drop the node reference once the platform device has been looked up and
> release the device reference with a devm action.
>
> Fixes: 2151350f60d1 ("media: rcar-isp: Add support for ISPCORE")
> Signed-off-by: Linmao Li <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/core.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/core.c
> index f3dc52c136120..8dafffdd8de68 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/core.c
> @@ -781,6 +781,13 @@ int risp_core_registered(struct rcar_isp_core *core, struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void risp_core_put_device(void *data)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = data;
> +
> + put_device(dev);
> +}
> +
> static int risp_core_probe_resources(struct rcar_isp_core *core,
> struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> @@ -820,9 +827,15 @@ static int risp_core_probe_resources(struct rcar_isp_core *core,
> return -ENODEV;
>
> vspx = of_find_device_by_node(of_vspx);
> + of_node_put(of_vspx);
I was about to suggest to declared of_vspx as:
struct device_node *of_vspx = __free(device_node) = NULL;
But maybe it is not necessary since there's a single call place for
of_node_put().
> if (!vspx)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, risp_core_put_device,
> + &vspx->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
For my education: what are the drawbacks of using
devm_add_action_or_reset() instead of releasing core->vspx on probe
failures and _remove() ?
Thanks
j
> /* Attach to VSP-X */
> core->vspx.dev = &vspx->dev;
>
>
> base-commit: 31152f5b0f8719f92063b8c6196cd5e34106c73d
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>