Re: [PATCH] media: v4l2-core: make number of video devices configurable
Ali Nasrollahi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anqdNsu7VS63YKOo@zephyr> |
On 26/08/10 07:28PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 07:54:07PM +0330, Ali Nasrollahi wrote: > > The V4L2 core currently limits the number of registered video devices to > > 256. This can become a restriction for workloads that create a large > > number of virtual video devices, such as v4l2loopback instances. > > We don't support v4l2loopback upstream though. > Yes, you are correct. But perhaps my description was a bit misleading. The main idea of this patch is not to support out-of-tree modules by any means, but to allow a configurable number of V4L2 devices to be created and used, whether through loopback devices or other means. > > Make the maximum number of video devices configurable through a module > > parameter. The default and minimum remain at the existing limit of 256, > > while the maximum is capped at 4096. > > > > The parameter is only available when CONFIG_VIDEO_FIXED_MINOR_RANGES is > > disabled, as the fixed minor allocation scheme relies on the existing > > minor ranges. > > > > The device array is allocated according to the configured limit, while > > the allocation bitmaps remain statically sized to the maximum supported > > limit of 4096. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ali Nasrollahi <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c > > index fd267fb74905..5a526b577970 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c > > @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ > > #include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h> > > #include <media/v4l2-event.h> > > > > -#define VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES 256 > > +#define VIDEO_MIN_NUM_DEVICES 256 > > +#define VIDEO_MAX_NUM_DEVICES 4096 > > #define VIDEO_NAME "video4linux" > > > > #define dprintk(fmt, arg...) do { \ > > @@ -39,6 +40,27 @@ > > __func__, ##arg); \ > > } while (0) > > > > +static unsigned int video_nr_devices = VIDEO_MIN_NUM_DEVICES; > > + > > +#ifndef CONFIG_VIDEO_FIXED_MINOR_RANGES > > +static int param_set_video_nr_devices(const char *val, > > + const struct kernel_param *kp) > > +{ > > + return param_set_uint_minmax(val, kp, VIDEO_MIN_NUM_DEVICES, > > + VIDEO_MAX_NUM_DEVICES); > > +} > > + > > +static const struct kernel_param_ops param_ops_video_nr_devices = { > > + .set = param_set_video_nr_devices, > > + .get = param_get_uint, > > +}; > > + > > +module_param_cb(video_nr_devices, ¶m_ops_video_nr_devices, > > + &video_nr_devices, 0444); > > + > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(video_nr_devices, "Maximum number of V4L2 devices (256-4096)"); > > +#endif > > + > > /* > > * sysfs stuff > > */ > > @@ -98,9 +120,14 @@ static struct dentry *v4l2_debugfs_root_dir; > > /* > > * Active devices > > */ > > -static struct video_device *video_devices[VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES]; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_FIXED_MINOR_RANGES > > +static struct video_device *video_devices[VIDEO_MIN_NUM_DEVICES]; > > +static DECLARE_BITMAP(devnode_nums[VFL_TYPE_MAX], VIDEO_MIN_NUM_DEVICES); > > +#else > > +static struct video_device **video_devices; > > +static DECLARE_BITMAP(devnode_nums[VFL_TYPE_MAX], VIDEO_MAX_NUM_DEVICES); > > +#endif > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(videodev_lock); > > -static DECLARE_BITMAP(devnode_nums[VFL_TYPE_MAX], VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES); > > > > /* Device node utility functions */ > > > > @@ -504,7 +531,7 @@ static const struct file_operations v4l2_fops = { > > * in the video_device array, but it was able to obtain a minor number. > > * > > * This means that we can always obtain a free stream index number since > > - * the worst case scenario is that there are VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES - 1 slots in > > + * the worst case scenario is that there are video_nr_devices - 1 slots in > > * use of the video_device array. > > * > > * Returns a free index number. > > @@ -513,19 +540,19 @@ static int get_index(struct video_device *vdev) > > { > > /* This can be static since this function is called with the global > > videodev_lock held. */ > > - static DECLARE_BITMAP(used, VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES); > > + static DECLARE_BITMAP(used, VIDEO_MAX_NUM_DEVICES); > > int i; > > > > - bitmap_zero(used, VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES); > > + bitmap_zero(used, VIDEO_MAX_NUM_DEVICES); > > > > - for (i = 0; i < VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < video_nr_devices; i++) { > > if (video_devices[i] != NULL && > > video_devices[i]->v4l2_dev == vdev->v4l2_dev) { > > __set_bit(video_devices[i]->index, used); > > } > > } > > > > - return find_first_zero_bit(used, VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES); > > + return find_first_zero_bit(used, video_nr_devices); > > } > > > > #define SET_VALID_IOCTL(ops, cmd, op) \ > > @@ -915,7 +942,7 @@ int __video_register_device(struct video_device *vdev, > > int i = 0; > > int ret; > > int minor_offset = 0; > > - int minor_cnt = VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES; > > + int minor_cnt = video_nr_devices; > > const char *name_base; > > > > /* A minor value of -1 marks this video device as never > > @@ -1020,10 +1047,10 @@ int __video_register_device(struct video_device *vdev, > > #else > > /* The device node number and minor numbers are independent, so > > we just find the first free minor number. */ > > - for (i = 0; i < VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES; i++) > > + for (i = 0; i < video_nr_devices; i++) > > if (video_devices[i] == NULL) > > break; > > - if (i == VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES) { > > + if (i == video_nr_devices) { > > mutex_unlock(&videodev_lock); > > pr_err("could not get a free minor\n"); > > return -ENFILE; > > @@ -1032,7 +1059,7 @@ int __video_register_device(struct video_device *vdev, > > vdev->minor = i + minor_offset; > > vdev->num = nr; > > > > - if (WARN_ON(vdev->minor >= VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES)) { > > + if (WARN_ON(vdev->minor >= video_nr_devices)) { > > mutex_unlock(&videodev_lock); > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > @@ -1241,7 +1268,7 @@ static int __init videodev_init(void) > > int ret; > > > > pr_info("Linux video capture interface: v2.00\n"); > > - ret = register_chrdev_region(dev, VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES, VIDEO_NAME); > > + ret = register_chrdev_region(dev, video_nr_devices, VIDEO_NAME); > > if (ret < 0) { > > pr_warn("videodev: unable to get major %d\n", > > VIDEO_MAJOR); > > @@ -1250,11 +1277,21 @@ static int __init videodev_init(void) > > > > ret = class_register(&video_class); > > if (ret < 0) { > > - unregister_chrdev_region(dev, VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES); > > + unregister_chrdev_region(dev, video_nr_devices); > > pr_warn("video_dev: class_register failed\n"); > > return -EIO; > > } > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_VIDEO_FIXED_MINOR_RANGES > > + video_devices = kzalloc_objs(*video_devices, video_nr_devices); > > + if (!video_devices) { > > + class_unregister(&video_class); > > + unregister_chrdev_region(dev, video_nr_devices); > > + pr_warn("video_dev: failed to allocate video_devices\n"); > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + } > > +#endif > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -1262,8 +1299,11 @@ static void __exit videodev_exit(void) > > { > > dev_t dev = MKDEV(VIDEO_MAJOR, 0); > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_VIDEO_FIXED_MINOR_RANGES > > + kvfree(video_devices); > > +#endif > > class_unregister(&video_class); > > - unregister_chrdev_region(dev, VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES); > > + unregister_chrdev_region(dev, video_nr_devices); > > debugfs_remove_recursive(v4l2_debugfs_root_dir); > > v4l2_debugfs_root_dir = NULL; > > } > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart Cheers, Ali