Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add JPEG encoder node
Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <x7aje3k2jdf3skoafyd7ehteym4os4zp3y5hdavptjl6477oze@zsrzx763r3he> |
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 08:44:25AM +0300, Gjorgji Rosikopulos (Consultant) wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On 8/3/2026 10:09 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2026 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > >> On 31/07/2026 20:30, Gjorgji Rosikopulos (Consultant) wrote: > >>>>> Is TITAN_TOP a part of the MMCX or CX domain? In the former case, > >>>>> please drop separate mmcx vote here and let it come through the > >>>>> titan_top (it might require camcc driver and node modifications). > >>>>> > >>>> The change was requested by Brian, most likely in connection with > >>>> upcoming migrations. I think he would be able to explain the exact > >>>> reasons. As far as the facts are concerned, this is not currently > >>>> necessary for the driver to be functional. > >>> In the documentation we have this jpeg block need only TITAN_TOP_GDSC power domain. > >>> However Bryan request to ad MMCX and MX. > >>> As i can see same is for csiphy. Maybe is better to sync with Bryan. > >> > >> Check hamoa - I believe it is the case there's a separate vote required for > >> MMCX/MXA. > > > > Assuming TITAN_TOP gates MMCX to the whole camera block (please correct > > me if I'm wrong), why do we need a separate vote on MMCX? I might be > > missing something here, sorry. > > Honestly i really don't know, i am trying reach to correct people(find proper documentation) > for this. From what i have in the jpeg documentation only power domain which is required, > for jpeg core is TITAN_TOP for sm8250, i did not check the other platforms. The question is primarily about SM8250, since you are adding support for it. -- With best wishes Dmitry