Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: Add post-power-off-delay-ms property
Judith Mendez <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:51:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ulf, On 7/18/26 8:15 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 7:40 PM Judith Mendez <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Ulf, >> >> On 7/17/26 5:21 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 1:26 AM Judith Mendez <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Add post-power-off-delay-ms property to MMC controller common. >>>> >>>> This property shall be used to specify delay if needed after >>>> deasserting power during MMC power cycles. >>> >>> Please clarify with some additional information from the cover-letter, >>> like "specify custom delays after MMC power off to work around >>> hardware issues such as slow RC circuites on MMC VDD rails." >>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml | 8 ++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml >>>> index 3d7195e9461c3..3ff68d32a308f 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml >>>> @@ -275,6 +275,14 @@ properties: >>>> not available. >>>> default: 10 >>>> >>>> + post-power-off-delay-ms: >>> >>> For mmc-pwrseq-simple we already have "power-off-delay-us", perhaps >>> better to re-use that name instead. >> >> Besides having the same dt property name as mmc-pwrseq-simple what is >> the benefit of switching to power-off-delay-us? > > Using ms as the unit is limiting and completely unnecessary. What is > some HW is fine with 300 us, for example. Ok then, will use power-off-delay-us. thanks. > >> >> All values will have to be in us instead of ms and thus will look a bit >> less clean in code. If it is just a naming preference, I do prefer >> the current name in this version, please let me know if we can keep: >> post-power-off-delay-ms. > > The code is a separate thing, this is the DT property for supporting > different HWs. got it, will fix and respin. thanks. ~ Judith