Re: piping escape into dosemu

Mike McCarty <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-msdos
Message-ID <[email protected]>
TW wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> thanks for your patience.  I'm sorry if my wording was confusing -
> English is not my mother tongue.

No problem.

> It appears the following problem is equivalent to mine, but simpler to
> describe because it neither involves pipes nor echo:
> 
> Say I have a DOS program that shows kind of a splash screen which can
> be bypassed by hitting ESC.  (This is just an example.)  I'd like to
> automate this, so I start dosemu like
> 
>   dosemu -input 'thedosapp.exe\r\^['
> 
> because in the readme[1] I'm told that "\^[" is the syntax for the
> escape key.  At least that's how I interpret the "\^x" section.

Ok, we have a use/mention problem, I think. In your example, you
give a string enclosed in 'single quotes'. That string, as you
show it, should have two characters after the '\r'. I suspect
that you are typing three characters '\', '^', and '['. That
is not the intended action. What is intended is that you type
a BACKSLASH ('\'), and an ESC. The shell displays on your
screen two characters when you type ESC, but that is a single keystroke.

You may have to type ESC twice to make it work with your shell. In any
case, you should not be typing the '^' and '[' characters; those
are just how the shell displays the input on the screen.

> Unfortunately, this doesn't work.  So what's the syntax for the escape
> key?  I tried to find hints in the source code, but my C know-how is

The ESC key. You may, as I said, have to type it twice. I had to.

> pretty basic.  All I figured out is that the uhook_keystroke()
> function in dosemu/src/base/misc/userhook.c must be the function that
> handles the keystroke command.

Well, let's hope that gets you going!

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.