Re: Policy regarding linux-next only changes
Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:38:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-next,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG_fn=Vf==zhGjSNPcFC0=n9cw+NrBp+AqXgcmcV0uQBAcL9TA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 12:06 PM Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2026/07/04 21:06, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > I understand it may be nice to use such resources, but the solution is > > to talk to both sides, as you do in that thread. From what I see, they > > even offered to add a mailing list for those patches: > > > > "Aleksandr says we can create a special mailing list to test draft > > patches, so the series sent to that list is fuzzed for some time, > > similarly to how upstream patch testing works now. > > Do you think that would help you to debug these issues? " > > > > So what happened with that? It seems there was a way forward there, > > no? (Cc'ing Alexander from that thread) > > Alexander, was there any progress? > Hi Tetsuo, You can send patches to [email protected]. E.g. I ran $ git send-email --suppress-cc=all [email protected] patches/kcov-tetsuo-v7/0001-kcov-fix-data-corruption-and-race-conditions-on-PREE.patch to test your latest kcov patch and got the results here: https://ci.syzbot.org/series/33930a89-bb2a-4c5a-b6c5-d45829d5c94c The fuzzing ran on 8 VMs for 3 hours, and there were no new reports. Please let us know what you think of this workflow.