Re: Policy regarding linux-next only changes
Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:27:37 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-next,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <amS5yR18GwwUZhy0@MacBook-0RXW5> |
On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 07:38:25PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2026/07/25 18:38, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > No, what prevents you from debugging is that, from what you say, > > nobody is giving enough compute resources for your task. > > OK. Let's go back to https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] . > > If I were able to use a kernel config option which minimizes impact for others, > the technical problem for my task will be solved. > > But including what kernel config options (or kernel command line parameters) I can use, there > hardly is a discussion from developers / maintainers. The last discussion was 6 years ago: > As I said [1], the reposting was stopped 6 years ago, and no one could read other's mind to know whether it's still worth discussing. > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > Can we resume this discussion so that we can minimize surprising other developers / maintainers? > Yes, resending the patches, talking about it in a conference, or giving people a heads-up when planning to queue it via linux-next is the way to resume the discussion. Could you please do any of these? [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/akpxYEF2ZI7p1zn3@MacBook-0RXW5/ Regards, Boqun