Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the pm tree
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-next,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJZ5v0iN7jUhf9J7tUXOOx0BOtidrzRGUyVpVNSkkuUqLKPx3A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 10:40 PM Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/17/26 5:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > diff --cc include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > > index eaf13f6ac2d3a,7e57f9698f7ce..0000000000000 > > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > > @@@ -953,18 -996,6 +949,11 @@@ int acpi_scan_add_dep(acpi_handle handl > > u32 arch_acpi_add_auto_dep(acpi_handle handle); > > #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ > > > > +static inline struct device *acpi_bus_get_primary_device(struct acpi_device *adev) > > +{ > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > - static inline bool acpi_of_match_device(const struct acpi_device *adev, > > - const struct of_device_id *of_match_table, > > - const struct of_device_id **of_id) > > - { > > - return false; > > - } > > - > > static inline int register_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; } > > static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; } > > Looks good to me, thanks! It also looks good to me, thank you!