Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFSD: Update the atime for iterator READs

On Wed, Aug 19, 2026, at 1:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Code outside of file systems and library code has absolutely no
> business ever calling file_accessed.

Every call site in the kernel is a filesystem, so indeed, NFSD would
have been the first call site outside a filesystem.

I misread the FUSE code: I see now that FUSE does not maintain atime
in the kernel. file_accessed() from NFSD would have stamped a kernel-
side atime on an inode whose atime the user space filesystem manages.

I assumed FamFS would hit this very issue, but maybe it does not.

The TODO in fuse_dax_read_iter() is a bit confusing. Implementing
that should be a one-liner, or it should be replaced with a comment
that explains why that callback is missing an explicit atime update.

So we can drop 2/2. Sorry for the noise.


-- 
Chuck Lever