Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix BUG in nilfs_copy_dirty_pages() on dirty state mismatch
Ryusuke Konishi <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:32:13 +0900
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-nilfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKFNMonu620z87=b=+9Xwn44Zr9-CssQkn=mes5EqEc=iJUm0g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:17=E2=80=AFPM Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > > Syzbot reported a kernel BUG triggered within nilfs_copy_dirty_pages(), > which copies dirty DAT file folios/pages to its shadow page cache. The > BUG occurs when a retrieved dirty folio/page unexpectedly loses its > 'dirty' status. > > This issue arises because, since the commit referenced below, the 'dirty' > flag of a folio/page can be cleared asynchronously after the filesystem > detects metadata corruption and transitions to read-only mode. > > Resolve the issue by returning an -EROFS error if the filesystem has > transitioned to read-only mode. Also change the behavior to issue a > kernel warning only once instead of triggering a kernel BUG when this > unexpected 'dirty' state is detected while the filesystem is not in > read-only mode. > > Reported-by: [email protected] > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3D8baf9a79a3ffc6271cb6 > Fixes: 8c26c4e2694a ("nilfs2: fix issue with flush kernel thread after re= mount in RO mode because of driver's internal error or metadata corruption"= ) > Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <[email protected]> > --- > Viacheslav, please apply this for the next cycle. > > This fixes an issue reported by syzbot where a kernel BUG could be > triggered depending on timing after filesystem corruption is detected. > > Thanks, > Ryusuke Konishi > > fs/nilfs2/page.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/page.c b/fs/nilfs2/page.c > index a9d8aa65416f..1d00bce21c37 100644 > --- a/fs/nilfs2/page.c > +++ b/fs/nilfs2/page.c > @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ static void nilfs_copy_folio(struct folio *dst, struc= t folio *src, > int nilfs_copy_dirty_pages(struct address_space *dmap, > struct address_space *smap) > { > + struct inode *smap_inode =3D smap->host; > struct folio_batch fbatch; > unsigned int i; > pgoff_t index =3D 0; > @@ -258,8 +259,19 @@ int nilfs_copy_dirty_pages(struct address_space *dma= p, > struct folio *folio =3D fbatch.folios[i], *dfolio; > > folio_lock(folio); > - if (unlikely(!folio_test_dirty(folio))) > - NILFS_FOLIO_BUG(folio, "inconsistent dirty state"= ); > + if (unlikely(!folio_test_dirty(folio))) { > + if (WARN_ONCE(!sb_rdonly(smap_inode->i_sb), > + "inconsistent dirty state\n")) > + goto unlock_folio; > + > + /* > + * If the filesystem has been forced to read-only > + * due to metadata corruption. > + */ > + folio_unlock(folio); > + err =3D -EROFS; > + break; > + } > > dfolio =3D filemap_grab_folio(dmap, folio->index); > if (IS_ERR(dfolio)) { > @@ -277,6 +289,7 @@ int nilfs_copy_dirty_pages(struct address_space *dmap= , > > folio_unlock(dfolio); > folio_put(dfolio); > +unlock_folio: > folio_unlock(folio); > } > folio_batch_release(&fbatch); > -- > 2.43.0 > Hi Viacheslav, Sorry for the disturbance while you are busy. Could you please pick up the following four pending patches - including this one - for the next cycle at your convenience? Excluding those already applied, these are the ones submitted by me or requested for direct pick-up since the weekend before last: - [PATCH] nilfs2: fix slab-out-of-bounds in nilfs_direct_propagate after truncation - [PATCH v2] nilfs2: fix infinite loop in nilfs_clean_segments() - [PATCH] nilfs2: prevent out-of-bounds read in super root block parsing - [PATCH] nilfs2: fix BUG in nilfs_copy_dirty_pages() on dirty state mismat= ch Thanks, Ryusuke Konishi