Re: [PATCH 3/7] numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1

Lee Schermerhorn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-numa,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 11:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:41:52 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 10:12 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:09:32 EDT, Lee Schermerhorn said:
> > > > 
> > > > You asked about the fix3 patch [offlist] on Wednesday, 19May.  Do you
> > > > have that one in your tree?
> > >  
> > > numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix3.patch
> > > was in -mmotm0521.
> > 
> > Right.  But, Andrew needs:
> > numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix3 --
> > i.e., a fix to the 2nd patch of the percpu numa_*_id patch series.
> > 
> 
> blah.
> 
> I have a
> numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1.patch
> and a fix3.  Was there ever a fix2?

Yes.  Here's a link to it in your 5/21 mmotm series:

http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix2.patch
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.