Re: time for libnuma/numactl 2.0.4 release?
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-numa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:35:17AM -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 07:25 -0500, Cliff Wickman wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > The last release of libnuma and numactl was 2.0.3, in June 2009.
> > Since then there have been 5 patches, in the period Aug2009-Apr2010.
> >
> > Do you have any work in progress? Or objections to declaring a 2.0.4 release?
>
> Hi, Cliff:
>
> I have nothing queued. I think it would be good to push out what you
> have. Then we can lean on, e.g., Red Hat to pull 2.0.4 fixes into
> RHEL[56] at earliest convenience. I just checked the RHEL6 libnuma, man
> pages, ... and see that they have a stale get_mempolicy() man page [not
> part of the numactl package, I know] and the libnuma with the
> broken/missing numa_num_{task|thread}_cpus(), ...
>
> Are you including Jan Beulich's recent patches in your 5 above. And, I
> did send you patches for the numa_num_*_cpus() fix back around 8apr,
> right?
I have these:
- Fix numactl for a machine with sparse cpu ids (Anton Blanchard)
[PATCH] libnuma: Fix issue with numactl --hardware on sparse cpumaps
- Fix makefile to remove move_pages on make clean (Andi)
[PATCH] Fix make clean for tests in numactl-2.0.4-rc1
- Fix numa_node_to_cpus() (Sharyathi Nagesh)
Subject: Fix to numa_node_to_cpus_v2
- Rename 'thread' to 'task' (L.S.)
[PATCH] Fix libnuma numa_num_{task vs thread}_{cpu|node}s() naming discrepancy
- Remove other trailing spaces (Cliff)
But not Jan Beulich's recent patches. I don't see them in my linux-numa
mailbox. Did I lose them?!
-Cliff
--
Cliff Wickman
SGI
[email protected]
(651) 683-3824