Re: NUMA page allocation from next Node

Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-numa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
What kind of NUMA setting i should look for ? I gather following config values ?

Speed : Max Performance
LV-DIMM Power : Low Power
Memory Channel Mode : Independent
Socket Interleave : NUMA
Patrol Scrub : Disabled
Demand Scrub : Enable
Turbo Mode : Enabled
Turbo Boost : Traditional
C1 Enahnced Mode : Disabled
Report C2 OS : Disabled
ACPI C-State : C3
VT : Disabled
Cache Data Prefetch : Enabled
Data Reuse : Enabled
QPI Link Speed : Max
AEM PowerCapping : Disabled
__
Tharindu R Bamunuarachchi.




On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Jiahua <[email protected]> wrote:
> Did you check the BIOS NUMA settings?
>
> Jiahua
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Finally I could isolate the issue further.
>> I tried following kernels and hardware.
>> Issue is visible only with IBM + SLES 11.
>>
>> 1. SLES 11 + IBM HW --> Issue is Visible
>> 2. SLES 11 + HP, Sun HW --> Issue is not Visible
>> 2. 2.6.32 Vanilla + Any HW --> Issue is not Visible
>> 3. 2.6.36 Vanilla + Any HW --> Issue is not Visible
>>
>> HP has same hardware as IBM. Both Nehalem. Sun is bit old Opteron.
>>
>> Any thoughts ?
>> __
>> Tharindu R Bamunuarachchi.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Tharindu,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 09:57:53PM +0530, Tharindu Rukshan
>> > Bamunuarachchi wrote:
>> >> Dear All,
>> >>
>> >> Today, we experienced abnormal memory allocation behavior.
>> >> I do not know whether this is the expected behavior or due to
>> >> misconfiguration.
>> >>
>> >> I have two node NUMA system and 100G TMPFS mount.
>> >>
>> >> 1. When "dd" running freely (without CPU affinity) all memory pages
>> >> were allocated from NODE 0 and then from NODE 1.
>> >>
>> >> 2. When "dd" running bound (using taskset) to CPU core in NODE 1 ....
>> >>     All memory pages were started to be allocated from NODE 1.
>> >>     BUT machine stopped responding after exhausting NODE 1.
>> >>     No memory pages were started to be allocated from NODE 0.
>> >>
>> >> Why "dd" cannot allocate memory from NODE 0 when it is running bound
>> >> to NODE 1 CPU core ?
>> >>
>> >> Please help.
>> >> I am using SLES 11 with 2.6.27 kernel.
>> >
>> > I'm no expert on the taskset command, but from what I can see, it
>> > just uses sched_setaffinity() to set cpu affinity.  I don't see any
>> > set_mempolicy calls to affect memory affinity.  So I see no reason
>> > for restricting memory allocation.
>> > You're not using some other placement mechanism in conjunction with
>> > taskset, are you?  A cpuset for example?
>> >
>> > -Cliff
>> > --
>> > Cliff Wickman
>> > SGI
>> > [email protected]
>> > (651) 683-3824
>> >
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.