Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/8] numa - Migrate-on-Fault
Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:37:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-numa,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > - Virtualization with KVM (I think it's very promising for that) > Basically this allows to keep guests local on nodes with their > own NUMA policy without having to statically bind them. Confirm, KVM virtualization needs automatic migration (we need the cpu to follow memory in a smart way too), hard bindings are not ok, like hugetlbfs is not ok as VM are moved across nodes, swapped, merged with ksm and things must work out automatically without admin intervention. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>