Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:37:24 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-numa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000001417f654322-16016bf3-6c9e-4a9c-a1c9-8426bb84d854-000000@email.amazonses.com> |
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Petr Holasek wrote: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:34:01PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > > It seems that the check for processors specified with C is always done > > > > regardless of CAP_SYS_NICE or the possibility that root may be calling > > > > numactl. > > > > > > > > taskset does not have that problem. Nor did releases of numactl before > > > > 2.0.8. > > > > > > The recently added --all option may help? > > > > Which version added --all? Would the correct approach not be to check if > > its root runninng numactl or if CAP_SYS_NICE is set? > > --all option was added in version 2.0.9-rc5. When CAP_SYS_NICE is not set, > numactl will fail in sched_setaffinity() call even so. numactl should allow the setting of affinities if CAP_SYS_NICE is set.