Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Drop custom select for older dtschema

Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-omap,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mediatek,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 05:28:21PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 10:44:25PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Older dtschema <2024.02 required custom select to avoid applying this
> > binding to anything having "syscon" compatible.  That's not the case
> > anymore and this additional select has two headaches:
> > 
> > 1. Duplicates all the compatibles listed in the schema.
> > 
> > 2. Is error-prone, because it requires contributor to add the compatible
> >    in two places, otherwise the schema will be silently ignored.
> >    The select list already misses mentioning compatibles:
> >    mediatek,mt8365-infracfg-nao and renesas,r9a08g046-lvds-cmn (with the
> >    latter being reverted for different reasons).
> > 
> > This requires bumping minimum dtschema requirement to v2024.04, which
> > feels old enough to be a safe requirement.
> 
> I agree, seems reasonable enough given it's a jump from 2023.09 and not
> some large jump.
> The diff is nice too!
> I assume Rob will be taking it, but just in case..
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>

I expect Lee to take this. I suspect syscon.yaml has other conflicting 
changes.

Rob
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.