Re: [PATCH 0/6] tty: serial: propagate errors from uart_ops.pm callback

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 12:29:20PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 07:37:46AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> [260709 10:38]:
> > > Note, that Tony (you have him in the Cc list) did a lot for some corner cases
> > > with that and we still have them IIRC. Tony, do you know what is the state of
> > > affairs with runtime PM for UART?
> > 
> > The RX side of things should work for hardware that can wake up to an incoming
> > event. Linux for sure needs more work to properly handle the various corner case
> > TX wake-up of a PM runtime idled UART. I'm mostly offline until Monday though,
> > will check my notes for more details next week.
> 
> For the TX side handling, my understanding is that at least uart_update_mctrl()
> needs to call PM runtime resume and put autosuspend. And we should assume
> uart_update_mctrl() can sleep to resume the PM runtime suspended serial port.
> 
> For drivers, the callers of uport->ops->get/set_mctrl() should be updated
> to use uart_update_mctrl() where possible. And the remaining ones that cannot
> sleep should be fixed so they can sleep or have PM runtime disabled.
> 
> Anybody have better ideas?

I don't, but the above sounds like a plan. Is it a big task? I can help with
something in that area, perhaps Ilpo also would be able to participate.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko