Re: [PATCH] fbdev: omapfb: Fix __be32 sparse warning in panel_enabled()
Andreas Kemnade <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-omap,dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-fbdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 12:23:35 +0200 Helge Deller <[email protected]> wrote: > CC'ing the linux-omap mailing list, in the hope someone with omap > knowledge can judge if the sashiko AI bot is right with his analysis that > acx565akm_transfer() might be wrong on big-endian systems? > well, it sits behind the spi interface, which should abstract hw oddities. So wie should not ask about omap specific stuff. BTW: same issue in drm variant of the driver. > On 8/22/26 11:58, [email protected] wrote: > > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: > > > > Pre-existing issues: > > - [High] Hardcoded little-endian assumption when transmitting the command byte breaks the driver on big-endian architectures. > > -- > > > > --- Patch [1]: [PATCH] fbdev: omapfb: Fix __be32 sparse warning in panel_enabled() --- > > commit a9e06be56fc1b74d7c6e76133e9ea1c25675a615 > > Author: Helge Deller <[email protected]> > > Subject: fbdev: omapfb: Fix __be32 sparse warning in panel_enabled() > > > > This commit resolves a sparse warning in panel_enabled() by explicitly > > reading the display status into a __be32 variable. It then converts this > > value to CPU endianness using __be32_to_cpu() before checking the bits. > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/ > > > >> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c > >> index 8f430d9e80549..0202ca8cbfc23 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c > >> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c > >> @@ -210,12 +210,13 @@ static void set_display_state(struct panel_drv_data *ddata, int enabled) > >> > >> static int panel_enabled(struct panel_drv_data *ddata) > >> { > >> + __be32 disp_status_be; > >> u32 disp_status; > >> int enabled; > >> > >> acx565akm_read(ddata, MIPID_CMD_READ_DISP_STATUS, > >> - (u8 *)&disp_status, 4); > > > > [Severity: High] > > This is a pre-existing issue, but while looking at endianness fixes in this > > file, does acx565akm_transfer() have a similar issue on big-endian > > architectures? > > > > When acx565akm_read() calls acx565akm_transfer(), it passes the command as > > an int: > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c:acx565akm_transfer() { > > ... > > cmd &= 0xff; > > x->tx_buf = &cmd; > > x->bits_per_word = 9; > > x->len = 2; > > ... > > } > > > > Because bits_per_word > 8, the SPI controller reads the buffer as a 16-bit > > integer. Taking the address of a 32-bit int on a little-endian system yields > > the command byte in the lowest bits. However, on big-endian systems, &cmd > > points to the most significant bytes (which are 0x00). > > > > Will the SPI controller end up transmitting 0x0000 instead of the requested > > command on big-endian architectures? > > Probably yes, at least if I do not see uint32 * as a pointer in the tx_buf there. The more interesting thing would be the 9th bit. There would be some requirement neded and documented in the spi_transfer struct to put things into 32bit words if bits per word is > 8. Nobody would forbid using u16. Regards, Andreas